Retraction Watch Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process at Retraction Watch. Brian Wansink. A high profile food researcher whos faced heavy criticism about his work has retracted the revised version of an article hed already retracted last month. Yes, you read that right Brian Wansink at Cornell University retracted the original article from JAMA Pediatrics in September, replacing it with a revised version. Now hes retracting the revised version, citing a major error The study, which reported children were more likely to choose an apple over a cookie if the apple included an Elmo sticker, was conducted in children 3 5 years old, not 8 1. Watch Phenomena Online (2017)' title='Watch Phenomena Online (2017)' />Directed by Dario Argento. With Jennifer Connelly, Donald Pleasence, Daria Nicolodi, Fiore Argento. A young girl, with an amazing ability to communicate with insects. Movies Watch HD Movies Online Free and Download the Latest movies without Registration at 123Movieson. Watch the best free fulllength documentary films on the web. History documentaries, Science, Culture, Music. Watch Dirty 30 Full Movie. Explore and Enjoy 1 Movies Website here you can watch sci fi movies online for free. The best science fiction movies only on our website. Hannibal, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Bates Motel and more heres a handful of scary shows that are worth your bingewatch. Although Wansink told Buzz. Feed he asked the journal to retract the paper, Annette Flanagin, Executive Managing Editor for The JAMA Network, told us the editors requested the retraction Read the rest of this entry Willem Halffman. Serge Horbach. Although most researchers realize too many are using misidentified cell lines in their work, they may be shocked to see the scope of the problem Approximately 3. PLo. S ONE. And even though more people may be aware of the problem, it hasnt slowed it down Most of the papers the authors flagged were written after 2. Weve tackled the issue a 2. Watch Sin Online Flashx. RW readers showed most believed the papers that report data from misidentified cell line should be either retracted or corrected, and our co founders have recommended journals at least post expressions of concern. We spoke with the authors of the latest paper also covered by. The Scientist, Serge Horbach and Willem Halffman at Radboud University Nijmegen in the Netherlands. MjZ6iZP0&sz=hd' alt='Watch Phenomena Online (2017)' title='Watch Phenomena Online (2017)' />Retraction Watch You estimate more than 3. Thats a very large number, to say the least were you surprised at the scope of the problem Read the rest of this entry In July 2. But the authorsAlexander Kholmetskii and Tolga Yarmanstrongly objected to the journals decision, so much so they published a detailed rebuttal to the retraction on the preprint server ar. Xiv. The paper explores a new principle related to Einsteins theory of relativity. According to the authors, after the Canadian Journal of Physics notified them on July 1. But Kholmetskiiwho lists his affiliation at Belarus State University in Minsk, and Yarman, a professor at Okan University in Istanbultold us that the editor found their response inappropriate. As a result, the authors turned to ai. Xiv to protest the retraction. Watch CBS, AMC, SHO, HBO, MTV ABC TV shows streaming online. Series full episodes and complete seasons Free adsupported or Payperview on your decision. Ever more blatant and desperate actions of the power structure are increasing their vulnerability to disintegration from within. If we all pull together in the. Movies Watch Movies Online HD For Free and Download the latest movies without Registration at 123movies. R52gTf9uwM/hqdefault.jpg' alt='Watch Phenomena Online (2017)' title='Watch Phenomena Online (2017)' />Heres the retraction notice for Conservative relativity principle and energy momentum conservation in a superimposed gravitational and electric field Read the rest of this entry Geeta Shroff. Photo credit Nutech Mediworld. Journals are raising ethical concerns about the research of a doctor who offers controversial embryonic stem cell treatments. Two journals have issued expressions of concern for three papers by Geeta Shroff, who was the subject of a 2. CNN investigative documentary. All cite ethical concerns one mentions the potential link between the procedure the authors describe and a risk of forming teratomas, a type of tumor. Shroff has objected to all three notices. Shroff, a doctor offering controversial embryonic stem cell treatments at her New Delhi clinic, Nutech Mediworld, has said that for years she couldnt find opportunities to present her research to the medical community. Read the rest of this entry Via Wikimedia. When Retraction Watch began in 2. Ivan Oransky and Adam Marcus quickly realized they couldnt keep up with the hundreds of retractions that appeared each year. And the problem has only gotten worse although weve added staff, the number of retractions issued each year has increased dramatically. According to our growing database, just shy of 1,0. So to get new notices in front of readers more quickly, weve started a new feature called Caught our Notice, where we highlight a recent notice that stood out from the others. If you have any information about what happened, feel free to contact us at retractionwatchteamgmail. Title  Diabetes and Overexpression of pro. NGF Cause Retinal Neurodegeneration via Activation of Rho. A Pathway  and  Diabetes Induced Superoxide Anion and Breakdown of the Blood Retinal Barrier Role of the VEGFu. PAR Pathway What caught our attention Read the rest of this entry A new journal is offering something weve never seen before A cash reward to corresponding authors of papers it publishes. Normally, in the case of open access journals, researchers have to pay article processing charges APCs. But Minimally Invasive Surgical Oncology, an open access journal launched at the end of last year, flips the typical narrative it will pay corresponding authors 5. If any author joins the editorial board, the payment which the journal dubs royalties increases to 6. Editor Wenyuan Chen admitted its an unusual policy Read the rest of this entry In 2. Japan earlier that year. Watch Shanghai Online Full Movie'>Watch Shanghai Online Full Movie. But, in late September 2. Hiroyuki Gotorevealed that the Kumamoto Earthquake data contained wide reaching errorsand an outside expert had warned him the data might be problematic nine months earlier. Goto, an associate professor in the Disaster Prevention Research Institute at Kyoto University, issued two statements in which he acknowledged the errors, but did not indicate how they occurred. According to The Japan Times, Japans Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology is investigating whether the data was falsified or fabricated due to inconsistencies with other readings taken nearby. A report in another Japanese paper, The Mainichi, notes that Osaka Universitywhere one of the authors, Yoshiya Hata, worksis looking into the matter as well. Read the rest of this entry More than 2. Johns Hopkins University have signed a letter to Scientific Reports saying they will resign from the editorial board if the journal doesnt retract a 2. The paper is problematic, they argue, because a biologist at Johns Hopkins claims it plagiarized his work. One of that biologists colleagues at Hopkins has already resigned from the journals editorial board over its decision to correct and not retract the paper last week, another 2. The letter to the journal also includes a side by side comparison between the 2. The board members note Read the rest of this entry The authors of a 2. The revelation prompted the researchers to republish their findings in the same journal, this time with a title that flips the narrative.